The Irish Origins of Civilization

(Volume One)

The Servants of Truth

(Druidic Traditions and Influence Explored)

◊◊◊  ◊◊◊  ◊◊◊

INTRODUCTION
 

During the next ten years, the human race is destined to finally discover the facts about its true origins and destiny. As part of this discovery, we have to address the overwhelmingly important question of how the phenomena of evil came into the world and into the consciousness of Earth’s human inhabitants. This is a question that should be on the mind of every living man and woman. It has been with us for millennia and it will be with the children of the future if we do not come upon the answer now. We have left the question of evil in the hands of theologians and scientists for too long. This was surely a mistake for, as the casualty statistics clearly testify, the institutions of religion and science have been the worst purveyors of evil that this planet has ever had to endure. After centuries of prevarication and criminality, we can no longer afford to look to these edifices to answer the all-important conundrum of evil - Michael Tsarion (Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation)

The object of my book Atlantis, Alien Visitation and Genetic Manipulation, was to offer forth a theory concerning the origins of evil. I had long desired to discover how humankind’s penchant for sadism, cruelty, and injustice came about.

The book tells the story of the intervention of alien beings from distant galaxies who, upon their arrival to our planet, engaged in several genetic hybridization experiments. As a result of these transgenic experiments, “homo sapiens” inherited a divided biology and psyche. This transgression of biological sovereignty by the alien visitors caused man to be perpetually at war with himself. Man’s schizophrenic nature has given rise to schizogenic societies infested with injustice, crime, delinquency, and perversity. This is psychology “101” and it remains a self-evident fact regardless of whether the deep symbiotic connections between mind and world are acknowledged and accepted or whether they are not.

Sadly, it may take another age before people of today’s spiritually impoverished world understand the subtle rapport between microcosm and macrocosm. Nevertheless, let it be understood clearly and distinctly that freedom and truth will not visit the world while the hearts and minds of men remain toxic, immoral, and enslaved. As I assert in my other works, there can be no hope of positive change in our world until the true origins of evil are reappraised and understood, and until men take responsibility for their mutilated psychic condition.

The problems that beset us today, both existentially and socially, have a date of birth. As I show in my work on Atlantis, we were not always beset by such chronic psychic and social problems. Historically speaking they are recent phenomena. They date to about 13,000 years ago and they do not have to persist. In fact, it is my belief that we are now in the final phase of the old paradigm. The time is coming when both the protagonists and the antagonists in the human drama will be compelled to face the legacy of the past, and the forces that enter their lives to restore balance.

Although I covered some of the key events pertaining to the alien visitation, and subsequent infection of our perfumed planet by their presence, and although I did bring things up to the present “Silicon Age,” I stressed that it was not possible to cover the various exploits and machinations of the visitors throughout history. Space did not permit me to delineate the fascinating story of how the surviving Atlanteans and Lemurians (both descendants of the so-called “Fallen Angels”) toiled to establish new civilizations after incomprehensibly horrific cataclysms decimated their habitats. It is time now to address the new world that arose in the aftermath of the “Age of Catastrophe.”

◊◊◊
 

In the present volume, several novel ideas that the reader should be aware of are presented. The first and most important argument concerns the West to East migration of the elements of civilization. This theory rests upon the understanding that there were, in prehistoric times, highly developed civilizations situated in the Western hemisphere. These civilizations were brought to an abrupt end approximately 13,000 years BC, by terrestrial upheavals of an unimaginable scale. The gnosis that had been accumulated by the advanced inhabitants of these hoary civilizations originated on the landmasses known today as Ireland, England, Scotland, and Wales. These countries were once part of Atlantis or, more specifically, of the great continent of Appalachia. From these locations the gnosis was eventually carried Eastward across lost land bridges into Europe and Asia.

Secondly, we contend that the term Aryan has been most egregiously misused. We believe it referred not to race but caste. It was a term that simply distinguished spiritual and moral status. In our work, therefore, we use the term to refer to men from any racial stock who had perfected themselves in schools of initiation and who were adepts of high order. We use the term to identify the Irish Druids and their Mesolithic ancestors, the European Sami, the Phoenician and Median Magi, the Egyptian Disciples of Horus, the Mer, the Ibaru, and any other group of bards, poets, seers, prophets, hierophants, archimandrites, and architects of distinction. The term Aryan was erroneously accepted as a racial distinction after its discovery by the eighteenth century scholar and Chief Justice Sir William Jones of Calcutta. Jones discovered that the Hindus referred to their ancestors who appeared in Northern India and Pakistan during the seventh century BC, as the “Arya.” He did not realize that the term signified spiritual qualities rather than racial, ethnic, or linguistic ones. As linguists adopt the term to signify a class of languages, so we adopt it in a purest context to represent those Elders of any racial background possessed of exalted minds and hearts. We are convinced that our rendition and interpretation will serve to clarify many historical anomalies and mysteries. When speaking of the racial origins or nature of the Mesolithic and Megalithic Irish, we prefer to use the more descriptive and accurate terms “Nordic,” “Gothic,” “Caucasian,” and “Indo-European.”

Thirdly, we reject the term “Celtic,” and refuse to use it when describing the ancient inhabitants existing in Ireland before 600 BC. We tentatively accept that Britain was finally reached by people who have been called “Goidelic” and “Brythonic” Celts after 600 BC; groups that anthropologists and historians finally had to admit were merely fragments of the larger Indo-European race. Of these invasions have Tacitus, Caesar, and Pythias the Greek, written. Nevertheless, we prefer to deal with the pre-Celtic inhabitants and their antique civilization that had, in remote ages, spread Eastward into Europe and Asia. We leave the word “Celtic” intact when quoting, confident that the reader will understand that it is a blanket term often used indiscriminately by authors referring to Ireland’s exceptionally gifted inhabitants who are, more correctly, the “Mesolithic” or even “Megalithic” people; builders of the cyclopean temples of Ireland and the world that still stand as silent testaments to their august presence. The Celtic tribes of the Iron Age, believed to have entered Ireland after 600 BC, built their own civilizations upon the foundations of earlier ones they found there, which they reckoned had been erected by the “gods.”

The Tuatha, G. W. Atkinson supposes, must be the highly intellectual race that imported into Ireland our Oghams, round towers, architecture, metal work, and, above all, the exquisite art which has come down to us in our wonderful illuminated Irish manuscripts.  The polished Tuatha were certainly contrasted with the rude Celts. Arthur Clive declares that civilization came in with an earlier race than the Celts, and retired with their conquest by the latter - James Bonwick (Irish Druids and Old Irish Religions)

The Tuatha de Danann were the ancient inhabitants of Ireland who were forced to give way to the Gaels and to become the gods of Celtic imagination, the lords of the subterranean world. There is no doubt that the name Tuatha de Danann was given to the pre-Celtic inhabitants of Ireland and that it must have been they who built the megaliths. Their uncertain origins combined with their curious stone constructions give them a cloak of mystery...If the Celts drove out the megalithic peoples of Ireland, there is no reason why the same thing should not have happened on the continent, where much of the region occupied by the Celts still bears traces of megalithic monuments - Jean Markale (The Celts)

The first authority to dispense with the term “Celtic,” and to point out its spuriousness, was the great alternative historian and linguist Professor Laurence Austine Waddell. Strangely, although they probably were, and are, familiar with Professor Waddell’s writings and theories, most historians (alternative and orthodox) have continued to employ the term “Celtic” even when it is liable to engender and perpetuate misunderstandings. In our work we adhere to Professor Waddell’s sound counsel regarding this unfortunate but widely used term.

...there is no evidence in the British Isles to suggest that a population group of any size migrated from the continent in the first millennium BC - Sir Barrington Windsor Cunliffe (Iron Age Britain)

No traditional or historical reference or record whatever exists of the migration of any people called "Celts" into Early Britain - Professor L. A. Waddell (Phoenician Origins of the Britons, Scots, and Anglo-Saxons)

 …to speak, as is so commonly done, of "Celtic ancestry," the "Celtic temperament" and "Celtic fire" amongst any section of the natives of these islands, is, according to anthropologists, merely imaginary! - ibid

The term “Celt” did not exist in the ancient languages of the Irish, Scots, or Welsh. There is only the Pictish Khaltis, most likely signifying invaders from France, Belgium, Germany, Galatia, and the Ukraine. The term “Celt” (Keltoi) was first employed by the incompetent Greek historian Herodotus to describe Western Europeans such as the Irish, Scots, and Gauls, etc. After his time other historians, such as Caesar and Strabo, continued to use this vague term to broadly denote any foreign tribe that Rome considered barbaric and antagonistic. Suggestively, however, Caesar, Tacitus, Hecataeus, Strabo, and Herodatus, never employed the term to describe the people of Britain. And this at least we find accurate. Possibly, they knew that these Celtic groups were, as their languages indicate, merely a branch of the Indo-European race that had inherited their language, customs, traditions, and religion from highly sophisticated ancestors whom most historians and anthropologists have been conspicuously reluctant to name or describe, and whose influence had spread to India, Egypt, China, and the Americas. It is only in relatively recent times that this ambiguous term “Celtic” has been transposed to define the early Irish. By the nineteenth century its usage in this regard was common. Nevertheless, to use the term “Celtic” to signify the racial quality of the ancient Irish is an utterly futile endeavor since the physiology, stature, and pigmentation of these peoples is markedly dissimilar from those Pictish, Gaelic, Slavic, Germanic, Alpine, Iberian, Mediterranean, (“Continental”) Celtic types that, although related to Indo-European races, had probably perpetually crossed-bred with non-Caucasians throughout Europe and Asia.

In the composition of Celtic the old Indo-European predominates enormously. This is an established fact of great importance - M. R. Dobie (The Rise of the Celts)

So we see that the ambiguous term “Celtic” was introduced at a late date by Greeks and Romans. Then in the seventeenth century it was re-introduced by the Welsh antiquarian Edward Lhuyd (1660-1709), and by others of his sentimental disposition. We would prefer the term be dropped universally when referring to the racial origins of the ancient Britons and Irish. The Irish were not “Celtic.” They were Celticized by invading foreign powers; particularly those from Rome.

Did the islanders really call themselves Celts?...It is extremely doubtful whether the inhabitants of Ireland ever gave themselves a name of the kind - M. R. Dobie (The Rise of the Celts)

However, there is one thing that the Romans, modern archaeologists and the Iron Age islanders themselves would all agree on: they were not Celts. This was an invention of the 18th century; the name was not used earlier. The idea came from the discovery around 1700 that the non-English island tongues relate to that of the ancient continental Gauls, who really were called Celts. This ancient continental ethnic label was applied to the wider family of languages. But 'Celtic' was soon extended to describe insular monuments, art, culture and peoples, ancient and modern: island 'Celtic' identity was born, like Britishness, in the 18th century – Dr. Simon James (The Peoples of Britain)

After its introduction by Edward Lluyd in 1707, the use of the word "Celtic" as an umbrella term for the pre-Roman peoples of Britain gained considerable popularity in the nineteenth century, and remains in common usage. However its historical basis is now seen as dubious by many historians and archaeologists, and this usage has been called into question. Simon James, formerly of the British Museum…makes the point that the Romans never used the term "Celtic”...in reference to the peoples of Britain and Ireland, and points out that the modern term "Celt" was coined as a useful umbrella term in the early 18th century to distinguish the non-English inhabitants of the archipelago when England united with Scotland in 1707 to create the Kingdom of Great Britain and the later union of Great Britain and Ireland as the United Kingdom in 1800. Nationalists in Scotland, Ireland and Wales looked for a way to differentiate themselves from England and assert their right to independence. James then argues that, despite the obvious linguistic connections, archaeology does not suggest a united Celtic culture and that the term is misleading, no more (or less) meaningful than "Western" - (Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia)

The so-called Celtic Question, than which no greater stumbling block in the way of clear thinking exists…there is practically today a complete unanimity of opinion among physical anthropologists that the term Celt, if used at all, belongs to the brachycephalic (round-headed) darkish population of the Alpine (Swiss) highlands…totally lacking in the British Isles - W. Z. Ripley (Races of Europe)

"Celt" is now a term that skeptics consider so corrupted in the archaeological and popular literature that it is worthless - Stephen Oppenheimer (The Origins of the British: A Genetic Detective Story)

The term “Gaelic” (referring to later Celtic arrivals, the “Goidels”) is retained when quoting, and as a traditionally acceptable term for the language spoken in Ireland from a remote period, influenced by later visitors, and radically modified after the colonization of Romans, Anglo-Saxons, and Normans. We hesitate to use the term to designate the primordial inhabitants of Ireland. The Gaels, or Goidels, were another branch of the Celtic groups from Europe who allegedly crossed to Ireland around the fourth, fifth, or sixth centuries BC (depending on which officially posited theory one believes). These Goidels were known by the Irish mythographers as the “Milesians” or “Children of Mil.” They were descendants of the Scythian “Celts” who had visited Egypt and returned to their Western homelands after the reign of Pharaoh Akhenaton. Among their number was Scota, the daughter of the Atonist pharaoh and his consort Nefertiti.

◊◊◊

In his fine book Dawn of Civilization, Egyptologist Sir G. Maspero expressed a great historical question that we seek, in our present text, to address and solve. He asked:

What were the people by whom it (Egyptian Civilization) was developed, the country whence they came, the Race to which they belonged, is today unknown

The solution to this age-old problem involves a critical look at the information that has been supplied to us concerning the origin, migration, and dispersion of the elements of civilization. It involves a reappraisal of Post-Diluvian history and of the roles played, not only by the empires of Asia Minor and Egypt, but also by those of Ireland, Scotland, Wales, and England. This work will show the reader how important the ancient lands, known poetically as Logres and Albion, were to the future of the world. In this text, we will show that the civilizing role of these lands has been deliberately obscured due to a pernicious age-long campaign of knowledge suppression and mass-murder.

The auction of a whole civilization, the finest known, and the extermination of the Druids, are two of many subjects that are brought into the limelight in these volumes. It is for this reason that this author first chose, in his previous book, to deal with Atlantis and Lemuria, since it was from there that the story of the ancestors of the Gaels and Celts began. If we are to seek out the origins of the Arthurian legends and of the Welsh, Irish, and Scottish myths, it is to lost Atlantis and Lemuria that we are to look. And if we are to seek out reasons as to why the true story of these places and peoples has not hitherto been revealed, we need to begin with the contingents who dominate and rule mankind from behind the obvious thrones of religion and politics. As I revealed in my first book, these ruthless agencies also happen to have their origins in the ancient past. They are either the biological or ideological descendants of the sorcerers of Atlantis.

In our text we wish to accomplish three main things. We wish to explore, as much as may be possible, the evidence for the West to East migration of the elements of civilization. However, since it is illogical to suppose that any single volume can hope to furnish complete proof of this thesis, we offer our work as an introductory overview to stimulate interest with the reminder that it is merely a progress report on a great study that needs the proverbial jump-start. This great thesis was first explored at the turn of the last century by Anna Wilkes and Conor Mac Dari and then, later, by the great Comyns Beaumont. Since Beaumont’s time interest has lapsed and we know its controversiality to be the reason for this. We specifically address the Irish origins of civilization and begin at least to nullify many of the counter-arguments that deem the elements of civilization to be of Greek, Roman, and Jewish origin. Furthermore, we eagerly examine the ancient roots of modern tyranny. The Irish origins of civilization have been obscured and we find ourselves duly interested in the nature and agenda of the obscurers. Their contentious work had to be for a reason and we suppose they have not confined their work of obscuration to this one area alone. Moreover, as we will show, the millennia-old knowledge possessed and used to good effect by the ancient Druids and their ancestors was appropriated by those with no legitimate claim to it. It has been used as a weapon against humanity. The wielders of the weapon of occult knowledge will be revealed and their executive branch finally exposed before the world.

We strongly believe and advocate that it is quite impossible for good men to ever triumph over the malign (and originally alien) Establishment that controls humankind without a thorough working knowledge of the way in which it operates to achieve success. If we are to defeat the world’s merciless and tyrannical hierarchs we must, like detectives, be thoroughly conversant with their modus operandi and, like hounds on a trail, must be familiar with their scent, so to speak. Our adversary is both a mutilator and a scavenger. It is a virus within the ailing body politic. It is a cunning alien force that has infected humankind with its own anti-human nature. It is within us as much as it is out there in our world. We are either of its kind, and under its power, or we are its sworn opponents. In light of this, my inquiry is not for everyone. It has been composed for the new generation of Opposers, imbued with an ardent and unvanquishable Spirit of Rebellion. It is a manifesto for those who will in their time witness the demise of evil and the ruin of its agents. It is not for those who cannot comprehend the severity of the infamy in their world or who lack the Spirit of Contradiction.

It is not this author’s intention to provide weaponry to those without inherent systemic strength, will, and passion. My message is intended for those readers who do understand that the domestic, social, and economic worlds they live in and labor to perpetuate, like the political parties voted for, have been created by powerful and sophisticated unseen forces that have, age after age, placed men, women, and children upon the dark altars of sacrifice as offerings to their vile perfidious gods. Like Edgar Allen Poe’s nightmarish pendulum, the blades of the tyrannical ritual-murderers are now as I write descending toward the neck of humanity for the last time. Time is short but, though it may at first seem meager comfort, let us remember that if and when lightening strikes in a shadow-haunted landscape, we get to see everything with incredible lucidity. For that incendiary instant nothing is hidden from the eye. May this work provide such a flash in the dark. May it illumine the workings of the ingenious machinery of evil that pulverizes truth, freedom, and virtue, and beneath which the once radiant, truth-intoxicated souls of men now lie prostrate.

Y Gwir Erbyn Y Byd ("Truth Against the World")